Hi,
On 18 Nov., 03:01, Adam Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm in the middle of writing some code to extract sql results, which
> means I'm doing a *lot* of forcing right now. It's almost enough for
> me to wish there was a convention (and provided definitions) for
> denoting lazy/strict versions of functions. (e.g. (map f ...) is a
> lazy seq, (map! f ...) is strict)
For what it's worth: I use the following convention.
- For code which is purely done for side-effects, I use doseq. eg.
(doseq [x some-seq] (println x))
- In case I want to have the seq in memory, or there are side-effects
and I need the actual results, I use doall.
(doall (map some-f some-seq))
On the other hand: you can simply create your own map!.
(def map! (comp doall map))
Just my 0.02€.
Sincerely
Meikel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
