On Nov 10, 2008, at 9:46 AM, "Graham Fawcett"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I haven't been bitten by the "do not use" revisions, R1089 onward, but
> it seems that others have.
>
> I'm just curious why the team decided not to use a branch for these
> breaking changes, and merging back with trunk once the breakage was
> finished?
If it's due to required effort, perhaps it's time to consider moving
to a VCS that's more branch friendly.
>
>
> Like many open-source projects, Clojure seems to have a HEAD culture
> rather than a Release culture, so intentionally breaking HEAD should
> be taboo, IMHO.
Agreed, and we'll likely stay a HEAD culture until the language
matures a bit.
>
>
> Best,
> Graham
>
> >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
