On Fri, 10 Apr 2026 19:59:15 GMT, Alexey Ivanov <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Possibly discussed before, but I missed why we do not want to update > > DataBuffer class as well, to ensure any subclasses are validated? This PR is only concerned with the JDK concrete classes. > > Should `DataBuffer` be a **sealed** class? No. For multiple reasons. Including compatibility and extensibility by non-JDK classes. The latter reason means that even if sealed classes were available when this was designed it would not have been one. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29766#issuecomment-4230688092
