Disabled the auto-crash features for Mac. Kind Regards, Anthony Laforge Technical Program Manager Mountain View, CA
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Mike Pinkerton <[email protected]>wrote: > I just had crashbot add a totally unrelated stack trace to a bug. I > emailed anthony about it, we'll see. > > Something is clearly wrong. > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Scott Hess <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Does this relate to receiving crashbot emails adding "Crash" labels on > > closed-out bugs where the backtrace doesn't apparently have any > > relevance to the original backtraces involved with the bug? I've > > gotten a couple of these in the past week. > > > > -scott > > > > [Unfortunately, I don't remember the earlier one, the latter is > > http://crbug.com/13113 ] > > > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:58 PM, John Abd-El-Malek <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Anthony LaForge <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> The short of it: > >>> > >>> People manually associated bugs in http:crash > >>> My tool creates its own map of signatures and for whatever reason that > bug > >>> is on all of them > >>> It goes through each aggregate signature and updates the status of the > bug > >>> (which is a flash crasher) > >>> It's made much worse because we are dealing w/ crashes that don't have > >>> symbols and cannot be aggregated... > >>> > >>> What went wrong: > >>> > >>> The limiting function (seeing if crash-VERSION) was applied does not > >>> happen for priority updates. This was actually intentional since we > start > >>> looking at crash data early on. However this should no longer be > needed > >>> since we wait for enough data that priority should no longer be > shifting. > >>> > >>> What can be done about it? > >>> > >>> I will put a limiter on setting the priority > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >>> > >>> Kind Regards, > >>> > >>> Anthony Laforge > >>> Technical Program Manager > >>> Mountain View, CA > >>> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Patrick Johnson <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> John's question is about why it's generating so many issue updates. > >>>> > >>>> Patrick > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Anthony LaForge <[email protected] > > > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > It's the role account that manages crashes and crash related bugs. > >>>> > Kind Regards, > >>>> > > >>>> > Anthony Laforge > >>>> > Technical Program Manager > >>>> > Mountain View, CA > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Patrick Johnson < > [email protected]> > >>>> > wrote: > >>>> >> > >>>> >> [+laforge] > >>>> >> > >>>> >> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 6:51 PM, John Abd-El-Malek < > [email protected]> > >>>> >> wrote: > >>>> >> > I got 21 emails in the last day > >>>> >> > for http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=20915 > >>>> >> > >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Mike Pinkerton > Mac Weenie > [email protected] > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
