erik.pilkington added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D49688#1172269, @rjmccall wrote:
> I honestly don't know why the `BlockDecl` is in the members list in the first > place; that seems wrong, for the same reason that we wouldn't (I assume?) > consider a lambda's implicit record to be a member. Looks like we do actually treat a lambda's implicit record as a member. This loop is only iterating over decls that are in the pattern decl's context, and I think it makes sense that the BlockDecl is there, right? Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D49688 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
