arphaman added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D49523#1169621, @jkorous wrote:
> Alex, I am just wondering if we shouldn't rather create another > implementation of GlobalCompilationDatabase interface (something like > InMemoryGlobalCompilationDatabase), add it to ClangdServer and use it as the > first place to be searched in ClangdServer::getCompileCommand(PathRef File). > What do you think? We can certainly create another class, but I'd be against adding it into `ClangdServer`. It makes sense to have just one CDB in there. If we had our own server instead of ClangdLSP then this class would be really useful, but for now this solution is probably preferable. Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra https://reviews.llvm.org/D49523 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
