aaron.ballman accepted this revision.
aaron.ballman added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LGTM!
================
Comment at: lib/Lex/LiteralSupport.cpp:815
.Cases("il", "i", "if", true)
+ .Cases("d", "y", LangOpts.CPlusPlus2a)
.Default(false);
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
> aaron.ballman wrote:
> > Is it possible for the library to expose those outside of C++2a mode? We
> > pass `true` for the C++14 cases, so I'm wondering about tying it to C++2a
> > explicitly.
> In the C++14 cases, we return true because we've checked C++14 mode on line
> 805. I was hoping to do that for consistencies sake. Depending on your
> opinion, bringing 805 down to 812/813/814 (checking inline) might be a good
> idea.
>
> According to the tests, 'sv' (string view) was the only one for C++17, but it
> wasn't really necessary to check here since it is only allowed on strings and
> not on integer literals.
Ahh, I see what's going on now. Thank you, this looks fine to me.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D49504
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
