klimek added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D28462#1147019, @enyquist wrote:
> @klimek fair point. To be honest, I've pretty much lost interest / momentum > on this feature, I very much doubt I will ever go back and re-implement from > scratch as you suggest. > Not meaning to sound rude, I just don't want to waste anyone's time who is > waiting for this (seems there are a few). I do agree this is frustrating - I'd personally really like this feature, but having an implementation that fundamentally matches the architecture of the code is important for long-term maintenance and sustainability of the project. This is unfortunately a hard / lots-of-work feature to get right. I do appreciate the time you took to look into this. Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D28462 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
