Szelethus added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D48436#1144380, @NoQ wrote:
> I think we need to finish our dialog on who's responsible for initialization > and why do we need to filter constructors at all, cause it's kinda hanging > (i.e. https://reviews.llvm.org/D45532#inline-422673). Agreed. I have some code in the works, and I planned to upload it as a separate patch. Note that I added TODO's around base class handling to avoid forgetting this. Here's my current thinking of the topic: I changed my mind, and base classes should be handled on their on. This has a number of benefits https://reviews.llvm.org/D48436 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
