t.p.northover added a comment.
> I'd rather not put target names in API functions. The meaning of that field
> is pretty target independent ("alignment of type, before alignment
> adjustments")
Except that rule only applies to aggregates. Scalar types get their alignment
adjusted anyway I believe. The definition is ridiculously arbitrary.
> If we use it only in ARM/AArch64 we can put a comment in that sense and maybe
> rename it to `UnadjustedAlignement` or something else more descriptive than
> `NaturalAlignement`?
I could just about live with that (or `UnnaturalAlignment`, though perhaps best
not).
https://reviews.llvm.org/D46013
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
