Szelethus added a comment. Thanks for the review!
I spend some time thinking about the support for lambda functions, and I start to think that checking for lambda misuse shouldn't be the responsibility of this checker. I created a new revision for that discussion, I wouldn't like to abandon this one until I heard what you think of this! :) https://reviews.llvm.org/D48318 ================ Comment at: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/UninitializedObjectChecker.cpp:687 + CXXRecordDecl::capture_const_iterator CapturedVar = + std::find_if(CXXParent->captures_begin(), CXXParent->captures_end(), + [&Field](const LambdaCapture &L) { ---------------- george.karpenkov wrote: > Could we just use a for-each here? Sorry for being opinionated, I'm pretty > sure it would be both shorter and more readable. Great idea! :) I completely agree, to be honest I scratched my head too while I wrote it down. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D48291 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
