ioeric added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clangd/CodeComplete.cpp:278
+    if (AllowIndexCompletion)
+      I.label = (InsertingInclude ? "+" : " ") + I.label;
     I.scoreInfo = Scores;
----------------
sammccall wrote:
> I think we should avoid tokens that occur commonly in C++ (possibly with the 
> exception of # which is used for this purpose. We should also avoid 
> doublewide chars because of alignment (even assuming a monospace font is 
> risky...)
> 
> Ideas:
> - something like "external link" icon on wikipedia - but no such thing in 
> unicode :-(🔗(U+1F517 link) looks truly terrible in at least some fonts
> - variant on plus like ⊕ (U+2295 circled plus) - can't find one I like a lot
> - some kind of arrow like ☇ (U+2607 lightning) or ⇱ (U+21F1 north west arrow 
> to corner) or ⮣ (upwards triangle-headed arrow with long head rightwards)
> - variant on hash like ﹟(U+FE5F  small number sign)
> - something unrelated but "special" like ※ (U+203B reference mark)
> 
> I'm not really happy with any of these :-(
Thanks for the suggestions! 

After playing around with different options, we decided to go with `•` which is 
simple and also aligns well in vim and vscode. We tried to avoid symbols that 
are meaningful/complicated because they tend to add noise when users are used 
to the existence of the icon, and they appear less elegant when there are a 
whole list of indicators in the completion results.


Repository:
  rCTE Clang Tools Extra

https://reviews.llvm.org/D48163



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to