aaron.ballman added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D47290#1125028, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> Okay, that's fair, but the vendor-specific type for my Windows example is > spelled `DWORD`. I'm really worried that this special case will become a > precedent and we'll wind up with -Wformat being relaxed for everything based > on the same rationale. If that's how the community wants -Wformat to work, > cool, but I'd like to know if we're intending to change (what I see as) the > design of this warning. I spoke with @jfb offline and am less concerned about this patch now. He's welcome to correct me if I misrepresent anything, but the precedent this sets is that a platform "owner" (someone with authority, not Joe Q Random-User) can relax -Wformat as in this patch, but this is not a precedent for a blanket change to -Wformat just because the UB happens to work and we "know" it. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D47290 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
