Hahnfeld added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D47394#1118957, @gtbercea wrote:
> I'm surprised you now disagree with this technique, when I first introduced > you to this in an e-mail off list you agreed with it. My words were `I agree this is the best solution for NVPTX.` In the same reply I asked how your proposal is supposed to work for other offloading targets which is now clear to require additional work, maybe even completely novel tools. So now I disagree that it is the **right** solution for Clang because I think my proposal will cover all offloading targets. Please give me a bit time so that I can see if it works. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D47394 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
