rsmith added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D46234#1082332, @xazax.hun wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D46234#1082307, @rsmith wrote: > > > Perhaps we should just use a null pointer for the not-instantiated arm of > > an `if constexpr` instead, rather than tracking a flag on an empty > > statement that is meaningless for real empty statements. > > > I will look into that, thanks. I wonder if any of the code assumes that the > than branch always present. I expect some code does. But this is fundamentally a special property of an `if constexpr` statement, not of an empty statement, so I think it makes most sense that whatever special handling we choose to use for this should live in the `IfStmt`. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D46234 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
