avt77 added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D43578#1068417, @rsmith wrote:
> I think we need to fix the overlap issue as a prerequisite to adding timers > with large amounts of overlap, especially self-overlap. Otherwise the numbers > will likely do more harm than good, as they will significantly misattribute > runtime. Fortunately, I think that should only require some relatively small > changes to the LLVM timer infrastructure. JFYI: the given patch introduces non-recursive (self-overlaps) timers only. I'm going to introduce self-overlaps timers when https://reviews.llvm.org/D45619 is committed. https://reviews.llvm.org/D43578 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
