MTC added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45491#1067852, @NoQ wrote:
> Yeah, i think this makes sense, thanks! It feels a bit weird that we have to > add it as an exception - i wonder if there are other exceptions that we need > to make. Widening over the stack memory space should be a whitelist, not a > blacklist, because we can easily enumerate all stack variables and see which > of them can be modified at all from the loop. But until we have that, this > looks like a reasonable workaround. You are right , it's really weird. And the better solution, D36690 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D36690#change-BqbIHiVwl2WX>, seems to be blocked. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D45491 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
