tra added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D44747#1055877, @yaxunl wrote:
> I will try fixing that.
>
> The CUDA kernel calling convention should be dropped in all DRE's since it is
> invisible to the user.
>
> Sam
Apparently it's not always the case.
Here's a bit more elaborate example demonstrating inconsistency in this
behavior. Calling convention is ignored for regular functions, but not for
function templates.
__global__ void EmptyKernel(void) { }
template <typename T>
__global__ void EmptyKernelT(void) { }
struct Dummy {
/// Type definition of the EmptyKernel kernel entry point
typedef void (*EmptyKernelPtr)();
EmptyKernelPtr Empty() { return EmptyKernel; } // this one works
EmptyKernelPtr EmptyT() { return EmptyKernelT<void>; } // this one errors
out.
};
Do you think this is something you can fix quickly or do you want to unroll the
change while you figure out what's going on?
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D44747
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
