obfuscated marked an inline comment as done.
obfuscated added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/Format/FormatToken.h:138
+ /// \brief Whether this is a string literal similar to _T("sdfsdf").
+ bool TMacroStringLiteral = false;
+
----------------
krasimir wrote:
> We don't strictly need this new field. We could do as in the old
> implementation and check if the string prefix is from a T macro in
> ContinuationIndenter.
Using a flag is more reliable and faster - the checks are done once, so they
don't have to be repeated.
From the field layout in the struct and from the usage of bools I could only
conclude that this is not a memory nor performance critical part of the code.
================
Comment at: unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp:10693
+
+ // FIXME: This is required because parsing a configuration simply overwrites
+ // the first N elements of the list instead of resetting it.
----------------
krasimir wrote:
> Why is the `FIXME` here? I suggest just use the pattern similar to the other
> cases here and just keep the test with 2 elements:
> ```
> Style.TMacros.clear();
> std::vector<std::string> ExpectedTMacros = {"_T", "myT"};
> CHECK_PARSE("TMacros: [_T, myT]", TMacros, ExpectedTMacros);
> ```
I've copy pasted this from the foreach macro option.
I've not investigate why this fixme is there.
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D44765
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
