rjmccall added a comment.

Hmm.  Sema is lazy about actually creating implicit destructor declarations, 
but it's supposed to only do it whenever the destructor is actually used for 
something.  I suspect that Sema just thinks that nothing is using c::~c, 
because the only thing that does use it is d::~d, which is inline and has no 
apparent users.  But from the stack trace, it seems that IRGen is in fact 
emitting d::~d.  So the question is, why is IRGen emitting d::~d?  Because 
AFAIK a non-array new-expression never requires the destructor to exist.


Repository:
  rC Clang

https://reviews.llvm.org/D44536



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to