smeenai added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D43842#1022498, @rjmccall wrote:
> Ugh, I hate `inalloca` *so much*. > > It's still an indirect return, right? It's just that the return-slot pointer > has to get stored to the `inalloca` allocation like any other argument? Correct. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D43842 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
