Typz added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D42787#994781, @djasper wrote:
> What I mean is, users will find it surprising if whether or not a parameter > gets wrapped leads to a different indentation internal to that parameter. I > have not heard of a single user that would be surprised by this extra > indentation. well you have now... I configured the tool to align AlignOperands, to I expected the operands of my expressions to be aligned, even if they are in a function call. (Btw, I don't think the comma used to separate function parameters are actually considered "operators" by the C++ standard, so technically this is not a case of multiple precedences, and users may not expect it to be handled this way...) Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D42787 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
