sepavloff abandoned this revision. sepavloff added a comment. The feedback here, in https://reviews.llvm.org/D40508 and in the mail list (http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-December/119585.html) demonstrates that this is a wrong direction. Part of this patch is used in https://reviews.llvm.org/D43805, which implements in some sense an opposite approach, - using nameless llvm types.
Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D40567 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
