Typz added a comment.
Hum, not sure I fully got your proposal. So you actually mean that clang-format
you format like this (with 4-space indent for clarity):
switch (x) {
case 0:
break;
case 1: {
foo();
break;
}
case 2: {
foo();
} break;
case 3:
{
foo();
}
bar();
break;
}
Is this right?
If so it does not really help me: I don't care so much how it is formatted, but
I think the current way is way too error prone (and I cannot change the style
to indent the case blocks themself). So i'll have to keep a patch in my fork :-(
Or maybe the behavior should be dependant on `IndentCaseLabels` (though this
would change LLVM style formatting) ?
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D43183
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
