craig.topper added inline comments.
================ Comment at: lib/Headers/mmintrin.h:1402 /// -/// This intrinsic corresponds to the <c> VPSHUFLW / PSHUFLW </c> instruction. +/// This intrinsic corresponds to the <c> PSHUFLW </c> instruction. /// ---------------- dyung wrote: > craig.topper wrote: > > This is overly specific > Just to be clear, when you say this is overly specific, you are saying that > it should be replaced with the text "This intrinsic is a utility function and > does not correspond to a specific instruction." Is that correct? Yeah. I just shortened my comment from _mm_set1_pi32. https://reviews.llvm.org/D41517 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
