vmiklos added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D41716#967237, @lebedev.ri wrote:

> That changes the defaults though. I thought clang-tidy *tried* to produce the 
> same results
>  on different clang-tidy versions with the same `.clang-tidy` config? Or is 
> there no such guarantees?


Hmm, I see this as a trade-off between backwards compatibility and consistency. 
Here I went for consistency, so that all of 
readability-inconsistent-declaration-parameter-name, 
modernize-use-default-member-init and modernize-use-using default to 
IgnoreMacros=1. But I don't have a too strong opinion on that, can change the 
default to 0 if really wanted,


https://reviews.llvm.org/D41716



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to