vsk accepted this revision.
vsk added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

Thanks, this lgtm as a stopgap.

As I mentioned offline, I think the goal should be to have non-modules and 
modules-enabled builds of a project produce identical coverage reports. I'll 
look into what exactly we're adding to the deferred decls map while iterating 
over it, and see if we're dropping any coverage mappings.


Repository:
  rC Clang

https://reviews.llvm.org/D41374



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to