pcc added a comment. Would it be possible to fix this by stripping the noexcept specifiers from both the function type used in the check and the one that is embedded in the prefix data? The downside is that we won't catch the case where the caller has a noexcept specifier and the callee doesn't, but that seems like an edge case to me, and we can think about fixing it in other ways later.
Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D40720 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
