NoQ added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D39862#921075, @george.karpenkov wrote:
> Of course I'm new, but I disagree with this statement: in order to have a
> robust API, the function should not crash, unless the caller violates an
> explicit precondition.
> `getSVal` is just a function for getting a symbolic value for a particular
> statement, it seems totally valid to query it for an expression which type is
> `void`.
Not for an expression - this overload retrieves a value stored in the memory
region. I think that we should inform the checker's author when he tries to
interpret the value in memory as a void value, because i believe that in pretty
much all cases he has a better type to provide.
================
Comment at: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ProgramState.cpp:265
+ // to the type of T, which is not always the case (e.g. for void).
+ if (!T.isNull() && (T->isIntegralOrEnumerationType() || Loc::isLocType(T))) {
if (SymbolRef sym = V.getAsSymbol()) {
----------------
george.karpenkov wrote:
> NoQ wrote:
> > If a type is an integral or enumeration type or a Loc type, then it is
> > definitely not null.
> But the check itself will crash if the type is null.
Whoops right sry.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D39862
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
