efriedma-quic wrote: > So this applies to types, but differently named structs with identical > contents aren't considered equal
Yes, this is computing equivalence using C "compatible type" rules (which say that the name of the struct is significant, but the name of a typedef is not). The big advantage of this form of equivalence is that we can use the existing implementation. :) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/195550 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
