llvmorg-github-actions[bot] wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT--> @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: Neha (nehaGautam07) <details> <summary>Changes</summary> Fixes #<!-- -->143719 `[[clang::no_specializations]]` diagnoses both explicit specializations and partial specializations. The old wording, "explicitly specialized", is ambiguous because that term means only `template <>` specializations in the C++ standard. This uses the wording agreed in #<!-- -->143839. --- Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/218758.diff 1 Files Affected: - (modified) clang/include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td (+2-2) ``````````diff diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td b/clang/include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td index 5ec2a68bc038b..95e27ad9a47c4 100644 --- a/clang/include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td +++ b/clang/include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td @@ -1466,8 +1466,8 @@ Query for this feature with `__has_attribute(diagnose_if)`. def NoSpecializationsDocs : Documentation { let Category = DocCatDecl; let Content = [{ -`[[clang::no_specializations]]` can be applied to function, class, or variable -templates which should not be explicitly specialized by users. This is primarily +``[[clang::no_specializations]]`` can be applied to function, class, or variable +templates for which neither an explicit specialization nor a partial specialization should be declared by users. This is primarily used to diagnose user specializations of standard library type traits. }]; } `````````` </details> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/218758 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
