vbvictor wrote:

> I did in 
> [89e11ad](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/89e11adb8cb7a463ae2f5c460e05759c63161086),
>  or perhaps the wording should be different?

We should update here
https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/cppcoreguidelines/use-enum-class.html#cppcoreguidelines-use-enum-class

"Finds unscoped (non-class) enum declarations and suggests using enum class 
instead."
Add something like "Unnamed enum are ignored and will be handled by check 
implementing 
[Enum.6](https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#enum6-avoid-unnamed-enumerations)"

And later we update docs with real link to check implementing Enum.6 check

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/215352
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to