================
@@ -9614,6 +9641,22 @@ unsigned clang_CXXMethod_isExplicit(CXCursor C) {
return 0;
}
+unsigned clang_Cursor_isConstexpr(CXCursor C) {
+ if (!clang_isDeclaration(C.kind))
+ return 0;
+
+ const Decl *D = cxcursor::getCursorDecl(C);
+ if (!D)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (const auto *VD = dyn_cast<VarDecl>(D))
----------------
AaronBallman wrote:
Can we have a test for lambda expressions too?
```
auto lam = [](int x, int y) constexpr { return x + y; };
```
I think this gets filtered out by the check for a declaration above, but do we
want this to return true for a lambda expression that's constexpr? I think so.
Additionally, this may not handle variable or function templates correctly,
should add test coverage for those cases too.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/183305
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
