leanil added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D38171#901427, @xazax.hun wrote:
> One problem to think about when we add all clang-diagnostic as "first or > second" class citizen, `checkes=*` might now enable all the warnings which > make no sense and might be surprising to the users. What do you think? This is a good point. Should I insert ",-clang-diagnostic*" after any (positive) * ? https://reviews.llvm.org/D38171 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits