leanil added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D38171#901427, @xazax.hun wrote:

> One problem to think about when we add all clang-diagnostic as "first or 
> second" class citizen, `checkes=*` might now enable all the warnings which 
> make no sense and might be surprising to the users. What do you think?


This is a good point. Should I insert ",-clang-diagnostic*" after any 
(positive) * ?


https://reviews.llvm.org/D38171



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
  • [PATCH] D38171: Implement... András Leitereg via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D38171: Impl... András Leitereg via Phabricator via cfe-commits

Reply via email to