Andarwinux wrote: It's really terrible to deliberately choose a slower method. Unlike f128, int128 operations aren't necessarily very slow: https://godbolt.org/z/34jxfjx4E
> If that's the case then I don't think the performance difference is > especially concerning. The type already needs to be passed in memory and even > a simple f128 addition is ~300 instructions (~50 for the shortest nontrivial > fast path), an extra movups won't matter much. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/210358 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
