Shiakaron wrote:
> While I absolutely share this sorting, it is already possible with the
> regexes and the priorities without any doubt or confusion.
@HazardyKnusperkeks I have tried to achieve this using regexes and priorities
but could only go far due to the iterative nature of this sorting. This is what
we have, which fails to replicate the desired logic:
```
IncludeCategories:
- Regex: '^[^/]*$'
SortPriority: 0
- Regex: '^[^/]*/[^/]*$'
SortPriority: 1
- Regex: '^[^/]*(/[^/]*){2}$'
SortPriority: 2
- Regex: '^[^/]*(/[^/]*){3}$'
SortPriority: 3
- Regex: '^[^/]*(/[^/]*){4}$'
SortPriority: 4
- Regex: '^[^/]*(/[^/]*){5}$'
SortPriority: 5
```
Is it possible for you to share the your clang format settings? I would be so
happy if this is really possible with the regexes and sort priorities
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/208954
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
