ilya-biryukov added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D39224#905431, @rnk wrote:
> Can you remind me why `NamedDecl::printQualifiedName` is not appropriate for > your needs? The use-case in code completion (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D38538, the interesting bit is in `SemaCodeComplete.cpp`) creates a `QualType` that is being pretty-printed later on. There does not seem to be a way to rewrite it to use `printQualifiedName`for that particular case without messing up the code. I was initially planning to simply create `ElaborateType` with proper `NestedNameSpecifier`, but that's essentially what the code in `QualTypeNames` does already (it has logic to create both the `NestedNameSpecifier` and `ElaboratedType` out of it), so we should definitely reuse it. In general, helpers like this look somewhat useful when writing features that present code to the user and the usage in `SemaCodeComplete` feels natural, at least from my perspective. https://reviews.llvm.org/D39224 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
