================
@@ -2379,6 +2382,11 @@ StmtResult Parser::ParseForStatement(SourceLocation
*TrailingElseLoc,
return StmtError();
}
+ // attribute-specifier without attribute (`[[]]`) isn't in AST.
+ // `__declspec()` is only applied to declarations, so we can ignore it.
+ if (!isa<CompoundStmt>(Body.get()) || BodyStartsWithAttr)
----------------
AaronBallman wrote:
Possibly. The cases I was worried about for token lookahead also involved lexer
stuff like
```
template for (int x : {1})
#pragma clang diagnostic ...
{}
```
and whether anything can usefully produce an annotation token before the
compound statement.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/209229
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
