AaronBallman wrote: > To be clear, reverting is routine; it keeps downstream builds green, and > simplifies the work of the release managers on the branch. It's not supposed > to be a reflection on the quality of your work, and I expect we can reland > soon.
Thank you for explicitly mentioning this @efriedma-quic, I should have made that more clear as well (mea culpa!). It's part of our developer policy to bias toward reverting: https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#patch-reversion-policy It's absolutely not a reflection on the PR author (my own work gets reverted for similar kinds of scenarios, it happens to all of us at some point). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/209593 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
