conrade-ctc wrote:

> Is this related? Our CI suffered all the weekend like that:
> 
> ```
> 22:34:14  # executed command: cat 
> /workspace/src/clang/test/Interpreter/emulated-tls.cpp
> 22:34:14  # executed command: 
> /workspace/build/stage/product_build/bin/clang-repl
> 22:34:14  # .---command stderr------------
> 22:34:14  # | JIT session error: Symbols not found: [ __emutls_get_address ]
> 22:34:14  # | JIT session error: Failed to materialize symbols: { (main, { 
> _Z6workerv }) }
> 22:34:14  # | error: Failed to materialize symbols: { (main, { 
> __orc_init_func.incr_module_25 }) }
> 22:34:14  # `-----------------------------
> 22:34:14  # executed command: 
> /workspace/build/stage/product_build/bin/FileCheck 
> /workspace/src/clang/test/Interpreter/emulated-tls.cpp
> 22:34:14  # .---command stderr------------
> 22:34:14  # | /workspace/src/clang/test/Interpreter/emulated-tls.cpp:26:11: 
> error: CHECK: expected string not found in input
> 22:34:14  # | // CHECK: tls = 2, 2
> 22:34:14  # |           ^
> 22:34:14  # | <stdin>:1:1: note: scanning from here
> 22:34:14  # | clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> 
> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> 
> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> 
> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> 
> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl> clang-repl>
> ```

@pawosm-arm, does your environment have a special build (non-default) for 
clang-repl? If not, it's probably that we scoped the triple check to Mach0, 
rather than more narrowly. I see it's now reverted, I'll put up a PR that more 
narrowly scopes the impact to avoid this. Sorry that this popped up for you! 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/208413
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to