ChuanqiXu9 wrote:

> WRT Eric's branch, I've worked with Eric to test changes he made and to test 
> it (see also the issues on his fork), and right now it ICEs on one contract 
> assertion in my (private) code base. GCC 16.1 also ICEs on one, but a 
> different one. As such, from a user point of view it's very close to the same 
> quality level as GCC, and redoing that work seems counterproductive unless 
> there's a different reason to do so.

I didn't know it unluckily. If it is already tested well and Eric is not 
working on it,  I'd like to take it.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/205739
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to