================
@@ -7282,6 +7283,8 @@ bool AArch64AsmParser::ParseDirective(AsmToken 
DirectiveID) {
     parseDirectiveCFINegateRAState();
   else if (IDVal == ".cfi_negate_ra_state_with_pc")
     parseDirectiveCFINegateRAStateWithPC();
+  else if (IDVal == ".cfi_llvm_set_ra_state")
----------------
jroelofs wrote:

I don't have strong feelings on whether this should be `.cfi_set_ra_state` vs 
`.cfi_llvm_set_ra_state`, but given there doesn't yet appear to be a binutils 
implementation of this cfi, I'm trying to be respectful of the top-level 
namespace. @walkerd @MaskRay any opinion here?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/205442
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to