================
@@ -7282,6 +7283,8 @@ bool AArch64AsmParser::ParseDirective(AsmToken
DirectiveID) {
parseDirectiveCFINegateRAState();
else if (IDVal == ".cfi_negate_ra_state_with_pc")
parseDirectiveCFINegateRAStateWithPC();
+ else if (IDVal == ".cfi_llvm_set_ra_state")
----------------
jroelofs wrote:
I don't have strong feelings on whether this should be `.cfi_set_ra_state` vs
`.cfi_llvm_set_ra_state`, but given there doesn't yet appear to be a binutils
implementation of this cfi, I'm trying to be respectful of the top-level
namespace. @walkerd @MaskRay any opinion here?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/205442
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits