================
@@ -22652,12 +22745,13 @@ static bool EvaluateCharRangeAsStringImpl(const Expr
*, T &Result,
const Expr *PtrExpression,
ASTContext &Ctx,
Expr::EvalResult &Status) {
- EvalInfo Info(Ctx, Status, EvaluationMode::ConstantExpression);
+ EvalInfo Info(Ctx, /*Sema=*/nullptr, Status,
+ EvaluationMode::ConstantExpression);
Info.InConstantContext = true;
----------------
cor3ntin wrote:
See, this is wrong.
This can be called for the message of a static_assert - afaik that's the only
use - and that is definitively a constant expression
https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.pre#13
This is the crux of my concern with this approach - we are going to miss spots.
(note that I'm happy to go with that if the community prefers it)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/205557
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
