nikic wrote: > I'd be fine with landing this change now, as it makes things less broken than > they are now. For module level asm we arguably need a way of attaching > target-cpu and target-features to the asm, which is orthogonal to what my > change is doing.
I believe that this is the actually correct way to solve this class of problem, and have implemented it in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/204548. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97685 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
