NewSigma wrote:

> Thanks for reducing the test. I still do not see a conversion function 
> template case here. `operator=` covers the method-template path, but 
> `AddTemplateConversionCandidate` is for conversion functions such as 
> `template <class T> operator T()`. Could you add one small case for that 
> path, or point me to the part of this test that is meant to cover it?

Ah, I misunderstood it. A case is provided for that path now.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/200662
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to