ilya-biryukov added inline comments.

================
Comment at: test/CodeCompletion/enum-switch-case-qualified.cpp:25
     // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -code-completion-at=%s:23:8 %s -o - | 
FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-CC1 %s
-    // CHECK-CC1: Blue : [#M::N::C::Color#]N::C::Blue
-    // CHECK-CC1-NEXT: Green : [#M::N::C::Color#]N::C::Green
-    // CHECK-CC1-NEXT: Indigo : [#M::N::C::Color#]N::C::Indigo
-    // CHECK-CC1-NEXT: Orange : [#M::N::C::Color#]N::C::Orange
-    // CHECK-CC1-NEXT: Red : [#M::N::C::Color#]N::C::Red
-    // CHECK-CC1-NEXT: Violet : [#M::N::C::Color#]N::C::Violet
-    // CHECK-CC1: Yellow : [#M::N::C::Color#]N::C::Yellow
+    // CHECK-CC1: Blue : [#Color#]N::C::Blue
+    // CHECK-CC1-NEXT: Green : [#Color#]N::C::Green
----------------
arphaman wrote:
> ilya-biryukov wrote:
> > This may be a somewhat unwanted part of this change.
> > Enum type is now written without qualifier here. I would argue that's ok, 
> > since the actual enum values are always properly qualified (they have to 
> > be, as they are actually inserted by completion) and those qualifiers 
> > provide all the necessary context for the user.
> I'm not 100% comfortable with making this kind of change right now. I'll try 
> to investigate what's best for our users.
I changed code to keep qualifiers for enums as is.
(This required moving some code from `libTooling` to `AST` in order to reuse 
it, I'll create a separate review for that if you're ok with the overall 
change).


https://reviews.llvm.org/D38538



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to