lebedev.ri added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:8719
+ // Type limit values are handled later by CheckTautologicalComparison().
+ if (IsTypeLimit(S, Other, Constant, ConstValue) && (!OtherIsBooleanType))
return;
----------------
rsmith wrote:
> Is this necessary? (Aren't the type limit values always within the range of
> the type in question?)
>
> Can we avoid evaluating `Constant` a extra time here? (We already have its
> value in `Value`.)
Uhm, good question :)
If i remove this, `check-clang-sema` and `check-clang-semacxx` still pass.
I agree that it does not make much sense. Initially it was only checking for
`Value == 0`.
Git suggests that initially this branch was added by @rtrieu, maybe can help.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D38101
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
