yronglin wrote: > I am not sure if we should apply the same policy between the `import` and the > `include` cases. > > For the `include` case, if the program is ill-formed under > https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/3078.html, it may be reasonable to > accept the program as an extension (with an appropriate diagnostic).
Hmm, I'm not sure too. Should we allow these rather "hacky" `header name` and treat these as clang extensions? Do you have any suggestions @zygoloid @cor3ntin https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/191004 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
