================
@@ -1514,7 +1514,8 @@ Sema::ActOnCXXTypeConstructExpr(ParsedType TypeRep,
RParenOrBraceLoc,
ListInitialization);
if (Result.isInvalid())
Result = CreateRecoveryExpr(TInfo->getTypeLoc().getBeginLoc(),
- RParenOrBraceLoc, exprs, Ty);
+ RParenOrBraceLoc, exprs,
Ty->isIncompleteType() ? QualType() : Ty);
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
Hmm... this isn't the right answer. We should be properly handling the
recovery-expr where-ever this causes the problem, not by covering it up by
giving the recovery-expr no type.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/191972
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
