aganea wrote:

> If I understand #145406 correctly, the per-target LLVM_BUILD_STATIC 
> definition (and by similarity probably also for Clang?) is only temporary and 
> should actually be removed. Would this be a feasible direction? Ultimately, 
> the goal should be to reduce the number of macro combinations with which we 
> build LLVM.

Yes that's the right direction but I simply wanted to fix the static builds for 
now. I think implementing #145406 would be a more involved change.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/191552
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to